I try to avoid writing about superfluous celebrity gossip and rumours and such, but this one has has had me befuddled for a while. Who the fuck is Amy Winehouse, and why is there so much coverage of her?
Alright, you got me. I’m being a little facetious. I know who she is. She’s a singer. You know how I know that? Because the news reports of her being a drug addict show up under the “music” section of 411mania, a site I’ve frequented recently. But I guess my more specific question is “why does anyone care?”
I’ve never heard any of her songs (that I know of), I’ve never seen anyone talk about how they enjoy her music, hell, I’ve never heard anyone outside of a tabloid newspaper or internet “news” site even mention her name. Purportedly, she’s a musician of some sort, but I have never heard a word spoken about that. All I’ve ever heard is that she’s a human train wreck. Let me take a moment for some “research” here (when you’re just looking on Wikipedia, you have to put research in quotation marks).
So she won an assload of Grammies in 2006 and had a fair degree of critical acclaim. Critical acclaim don’t mean shit though, as the cast of Arrested Development will tell you. I know that I didn’t have a frigging clue who she was in 2006. Oh wait, she’s the chick who did that Rehab song. I think I remember that. She didn’t want to go. Well that puts a different spin on this doesn’t it? (Or for those who knew the Rehab song first, vice-versa)
Her manager is blaming fame for her drug addictions. Shouldn’t that be out of bounds for a celebrity whose major hit was about her not wanting to go to rehab? Is anyone supposed to feel sorry for someone whose whole gimmick and persona is based on being an addict? If she sat down for a Barbara Walters interview, would she tearfully confess that “I only wanted to be a junkie up to a certain point, I didn’t want to be this addicted, this go way out of control”? It’s tantamount to Tommy Chong blaming pot for his career dwindling. Not a chance. Chong is smart enough to know that if it wasn’t for pot (either his use, or that of his audience) he wouldn’t have any career at all left. He knows which side of his bread is (bud) buttered.
Now obviously, there are always more sides to a story, and an angle of heartless music executives exploiting her notoriety at the expense of her health for profit is certainly tempting. But that’s ignoring personal responsibility. Unless a record executive tied her up and forced her to smoke crack, I don’t buy that as any sort of excuse.
Let’s remember, this isn’t like your typical rise and fall story, where Elvis gets addicted to drugs and slowly his handsome charm transforms into bloated death. This is a girl who got famous for being, to steal a great turn of phrase, “a drunk with a singing problem.” I fail to see the tragedy here. She’s doing exactly what she seemed to set out to do.
In the meantime, the funniest thing is on that 411mania link, there’s a further link for “more on Amy Winehouse,” and none of the stories that show up have anything at all to do with music. It’s all just personal drama. It’s to the point where I wonder if any of it is real.
Is it all just staged to get people hooked into her personal dramas, so that when she finally puts her life back together people will rise up and congratulate her with a thundering ovation of free publicity (and pursuant comeback album buys)? Did a British record exec get wind of the shitstorm of tabloid coverage (read: free publicity) given to the public breakdowns of Britney Spears and whoever else, and decide to manufacture that for themselves? For that matter, is all of the Britney Spears bullshit a failed early attempt at this sort of manufactured public drama (if it is a fix, it qualifies as a failure)? So, I restate the question, who the hell is Amy Winehouse?
Christ almighty. I’d also read that Spears story when it was on 411mania. Note to self: stay away from everything but the wrestling, video games and politics sections on 411. Speaking of video games…
It’s been joked about for years but it’s true, nobody does a better job of making the same games over and over again than Capcom. I want it made clear though, that I’m not complaining. I just tried out Mega Man Powered Up recently, and it’s pretty kickass. It’s an updated version of the first NES Mega Man game, with a few new bosses, an updated style, different levels, and to the pleasure of some, an adjustable difficulty level. Of course, if you’re a sadist like me, they also have a version that’s the original game but only the graphics are updated; it’s still one of the hardest games of all time.
As I said before, between the Mega Man and Street Fighter games, it’s pretty clear that Capcom loves to update old games. And around the same time as MMPU came out, a similar update of Ghosts n’ Goblins came out (also on PSP). Plus they’re also doing both a 3D remake, and a 2D update of Bionic Commando. The 2D Bionic Commando looks amazing.

Based on how satisfying the gameplay on MMPU was, personally I’d love to see them remake all the classic 8-Bit Mega Man games into that style. Of course, I can’t mention that without mentioning Mega Man 9, which has ensured the dampness of my pants lately. But that’s for another day.













on July 24th, 2008 at 8:54 am #
unbendable arm
kokyu dosa
Also it suddenly dawned on me yesterday why we were having the hand slipping issue with sayunage. It’s meant to be done with TWO hands. Gods, I need more sleep…