Global Warming prevents Global Warming

Yeah that’s right, three straight weeks of Tuesday Morning sciences. If you don’t like it you can shut your trap because I’ve just setup a new “science” category down there on the left hand side. NOW WHATCHA GUNNA DO, HUH?!

Crying Baby

Yeah, that’s what I thought.

Anywho, It looks like global warming is the hot topic at the water cooler this last month since one of our far-north islands, Ellesmere, had a huge chunk of ice break off of it for the first time in 3000 years. I mean huge. Like, 90% of it’s ice. Normally it was this little rock with a sheet of ice splayed around it but scientists noticed that the warmest-on-record arctic temperatures was sufficient to melt through the ice.

WELL FINALLY! Those poor polar bears couldn’t get at the taunting penguins through the ice.

Polar Bear and Penguin with cymbals

Oh wait, and What’s this? The Ellesmere Island Ice Sheets have been dissapearing since well before the industrial revolution? HOW INTERESTING!

I won’t argue that global warming isn’t happening, because I’m fairly certain it has gotten a little warmer. The lake I used to skate on every year as a kid hasn’t frozen over … well, since the last time I skated there. That’s all the proof I need. Well, sure, it could be caused by something other than mankinds dire disregard for the environment, but could it not also be that my heart is ice cold and my mere presence at said lake froze the ice? It would explain why it hasn’t frozen since I’ve been there. SCIENTIFIC!

However, people are failing to see the flip side of the coin - the planet’s oceans are the #1 absorber of CO2 and other harmful substances released into the atmosphere.

By bravely melting our ice caps, we have exposed more water to the air and the oceans are now capable of absorbing THREE TIMES MORE CO2 THAN PREVIOUSLY POSSIBLE. That’s right, ice melting due to global warming is helping to reverse global warming.

Happy good day

I don’t care what frickin’ side of the argument you’re on. You can be a corporate oil tycoon or a dirty-haired hippie. But I expect you to CHEER and clap each other on the back the next time you hear the ice is melting. That shit is nothing but good news.

Except maybe people that live in cities built below sea level. Instead of clapping each other on the back and cheering, how about you all take turns passing a pistol around and shooting the person on your left because YOU’RE SO FRICKIN’ STUPID. In my opinion, as soon as you grow old enough to realize you live below the waterline you MOVE. When there’s one of you left just give me a ring and I’ll sort something out.

PS: Those of you not yet regretting my subscription to New Scientist magazine can confirm all of my above stated arguments in the scientific publication Geophysical Research Letters, DOI:10.1029/2006GLO27028

3 comments : D to 'Global Warming prevents Global Warming'

  1. on February 6th, 2007 at 12:30 pm #

    Iright Daley said,

    Is it just me or did anyone else’s mind just get blown? It’s such a convenient truth, too!

  2. on February 6th, 2007 at 1:45 pm #

    Ashblaster said,

    New Scientist is pretty good. Living below sea level is akin to moving to a hurricane zone and wondering why your house blew away. I’ll tell you why; evil evil CLIMATE CHANGE brought on by the sins of man. I want to barf in Al Gore’s face.

  3. on February 6th, 2007 at 4:11 pm #

    Beaton said,

    Are you asking half the Netherlands to get up and find a new country? They’re pretty stubborn about living in a place that can be at any point submerged into the ocean. On the bright side, if that actually ever happens, the Dutch will probably build a real-life Sealab to prove they aren’t going anywhere and all my dreams will come true.

Put those fingers to the keys!

It’s the wood chipper for Stem Cells

STEM CELLS. Now that I have you reeling in terror, I thought I’d clear a few things up. I’m sick of all you nancies prancing about and getting your knickers in knot. That’s right, I’m talkin’ to you, and I’m not even capitalizing “nancies” so you know I’m dead serious.

So what are Stem Cells? In a basic, layman nutshell so you (yes you) can understand, a Stem Cell is a little itty bitty thing that naturally occurs in human bodies; the younger the body the more stem cells. Down to the point where you can practically suck pure stem cells out of an embryo.

A single cell is usually capable of building an entire organ, limb, or whatever.

I know what you’re thinking right now. Same as me, you’re standing there with your jaw agape and going “murdering baby fetuses to get stem cells so we can all grow fourteen boobs? HELL YES.”

Stem Cell Boobs

Well all those that try to oppose our fourteen-boobed good time just tried to deal us a lethal blow. Turns out some recent “scientific” study, Stem Cells are one of the primary causes of cancer, and a lot of stem cell research is being blown because of it. That’s right, no more growing extra frog legs, just cancerous tumors everywhere! OH GODS EVERYTHING IS RUINED!

Wait, wait, let’s take a step back and think about this. What just happened here? It’s one of the following:

#1: We have definitively proved that stem cells are evil and all work on them must stop
#2: We just found the elusive cause for cancer and can begin researching direct cures

HMMMM WHICH ONE WILL FOX NEWS TALK ABOUT… HMMMMMM

PS: Do you doubt my words because of my unprofessional presentation? SUCK IT, BITCHES: Cited source: Nature Genetics, DOI:10.1038ng1941 and 1950.

Gavel

2 comments : D to 'It’s the wood chipper for Stem Cells'

  1. on January 30th, 2007 at 1:24 pm #

    Ashblaster said,

    After reviewing god’s EPK I found that his hate for stem cells falls just behind evolution and fun. Isn’t “baby fetuses” a redundant term? Know what else cause cancer? Everything. Any process in your body that can produce a free radical can cause cancer.

  2. on January 30th, 2007 at 3:26 pm #

    weasel said,

    Well considering there is no clear, defined line on what is a “zygote”, “fetus”, “baby”, and all the words in between, one could say that a “baby fetus” is a half zygote half fetus. Alternatively a “baby fetus” is also known as an “elderly zygote.” It’s like Sharps and Flats in music.

    Also, free radicals tend to stimulate stem cells and start producing cancers. This is bad news because most cancer research to date has focused on the self-reproduction of standard cells; the good news is now we know what to research to stop it.

Put those fingers to the keys!

If you thought Scrabble was hard…

I’ve always been a big supporter of AI and think it brings an extra challenge to any game… Mainly because AI is sub-par when it comes to comparison between humans. AI excels in reaction times and memorization, but lacks in things like improvisation, path-mapping, environmental analysis, and dealing with various human factors such as vengeance and irrationality. One of the biggest detriments to AI is a lack of personality… a lack of finnesse.

What am I talking about? Well, let’s take a CounterStrike bot (I know, I know, not the best model of AI out there) named Bob. He won’t realize you hate his guts, and will stop at nothing to destroy him, and only him. Bob will never be found cowering behind a box; he’ll never advance slowly; he’ll never select a sub-par weapon against a weaker opponent just to show off. He doesn’t do little twirls in the air as he jumps off of boxes. He won’t be able to figure out how to carefully navigate a random hallway. Worst of all, Bob won’t teabag your corpse in CounterStrike after a particularly amazing knife kill. Hell, he probably won’t even take out a knife unless he’s forced to - not even if you’re 5 feet away and just started reloading.

Scrabble Tiles

Enter the ScrabbleBot. As far as I can see, it doesn’t actually have a name yet. It is in it’s polishing-up code phase, and is being demonstrated all over the place. This bot doesn’t teabag your scrabble-playing corpse with long triple-word-scores, but it does count cards… It predicts what letters you have on your rack based on what words you could have played given the letters you used in your last turn, and cross-referencing it with what letters are currently in play. Then the bastard uses that information to block your potential words while maximizing it’s own points.

It’s the literary equivalent of the knife kill. This bot is badass. I claw my own eyes out when I have a perfect word and my Scrabble opponent sneaks in and steals my kill.. And this bot would do it regularly and consistently. Like a jerk.

Up until now ScrabbleBots just maximize their own score and ignore whatever you’re doing - so this is quite the step up in the AI world. I’ll expect the next-gen video games to have bots with a rich vocabularly and to pwn me both verbally and physically. Don’t let me down, industry!

No Comments! =( Put those fingers to the keys!

Rare, Medium, Well, or Cloned?

A few recent surveys in the United States of the Americas have shown that 45% of the population believe that cloned meats are “bad for you,” and that 22% of the population thought they were “safe.” This struck me as particularly shocking; I mean sure, long term consequences are arguable, but wouldn’t cloned meats be even safer than normal? Oh wait, this is the same country that ranks #2… Out of the entire planet… For disbeleif of evolution. (And they thought they were #1 at everything)

Years ago, Dolly became the first successfully cloned mammal (a sheep). In that time, companies have not been resting on their laurels, waiting for some new whiz-bang scientific discovery. Hundreds of companies have sprung up, and there are ranches with acres upon acres of cloned cattle just waiting to be in your next McDonald’s bun. The American FDA is slated to pass approval on the sale of cloned meats in April, 2007.

McDonalds Cow

Yep, the “cloned meats” industry is a lumbering beast of massive proportions, and it has one giant momentum going right now. The FDA is going to have a tough time telling a few million cattle that they’ll never be put into human stomachs and all those investment dollars get flushed down the toilet.

I can see why cloning seems “evil” in the minds of many. Other than the religious aspects and the nefariousness of “playing god” and seeming like a Bond villain, one of the biggest concerns with cloning is the homogenization of the gene pool. People are afraid we’ll end up with one cow covering the entire planet. Sure it will be a supercow that passes loaves of bread as defecation, but folks are concerned a single new virus or infection would wipe out the entire population, and we’ll be up the creek with a million paddles made out of cow bones, but they won’t work because cow bones aren’t the best paddles.

Me? I welcome our new homogenized bovine overlords. I’m a smart guy and I’m sure the multi-billion dollar industries and investors out there have thought of that problem. The best thing about cloning is that they’re clones; they can be grown in test tubes. The best investment for any cloning company to make, is to run out and collect as many cow eggs as possible, and deep freeze ‘em. Load them into some computer databank. Map out the genes. You’ll start out with SuperCow Beta 1 and work your way up to SuperCow XVXCCIII Mark II. You’ll have huge databases and experiments and backlogs and data to work off of.

Cloned Cow Artwork

Before the entire planet puts all the (cow) eggs in one basket and settles on a single cloned animal for the majority of our food, I’m sure we’ll have enough templates and technology to simply re-manufacture the state of cows today, complete with non-homogenized diversity. Better to let the supervirus wipe them all out and start from scratch. Take notes, learn, and move on.

Besides, with the homogenization of the human gene pool, don’t we think it would be a good idea to test out a supervillainous virus on our bovine bretheren first?

I’ve just talked about long term stuff so far. The benefits of homogenized meat products? Every steak will be the most delicious steak ever. Every cup of milk will taste fantastic and last in your fridge longer. No more mad cow’s disease. Severely reduced chances of bacterial poisoning. Hell, someone could invent a chocolate cow and you could even get chocolate milk out of the damned things. They’re frickin’ SAFE. They’re DELICIOUS. They’re CLONED AWESOME IN A CAN.

And just think - with an abundance of working cloning operations for human consumption, now you can have that “other white meat” and not feel bad!

The Other White Meat

8 comments : D to 'Rare, Medium, Well, or Cloned?'

  1. on January 23rd, 2007 at 12:21 pm #

    Lyrish said,

    I’m against cloning. Seriously people, agree with me here. If you don’t, we could have two Weasels.

  2. on January 23rd, 2007 at 1:22 pm #

    Ashblaster said,

    Eating babies, no if’s and’s or maybe’s. I’m a fan of cloning technology. In a decade, maybe less, we’ll be able to clone just the meat and bypass the animal all together. then the cows can go back to their rewarding lives of poetry and philosophy. And just a word to anyone out there who “doesn’t eat genetically modified food”: you are a moron. Have you ever eaten food? Then you have eaten GMF. ALL food is genetically modified and has been for ten thousand years.

  3. on January 23rd, 2007 at 1:53 pm #

    weasel said,

    Well.. Genetically *influenced*, maybe, but actual microscope-modified gene-selection? That’s still relatively new, and I think that’s what people are mainly complaining about.

    Of course, your argument still stands. 70% of India’s population relies on laboratory-modified grains/wheat for basic survival. Take away gen-mod foods and you’ve got a huge death toll on your hands, worldwide.

    Penn and Teller even did an episode on eating “natural.” They had a good finishing statement (quoted from memory:)

    If you want to eat ‘natural’ and ‘free range’ and stay away from chemicals and genetically modified stuff, fine! Do so! No big deal, everyone has the right to their own choice of foodstuffs. However, to even suggest that it’s a viable option for the majority of mankind is idiotic and it could never possibly work. There isn’t enough arable land on the entire planet to support ‘natural’ crops to feed half of us, let alone all of us.

    Also, hooray for grown meat! Yep, some scientists made a pork steak in a test tube with no other supporting organs (no heart/liver/lungs/blood)… Just a few stem cells and POOF instant steak. Of course we’re tens of years away from getting FDA approval on that but still, pretty cool.

  4. on January 23rd, 2007 at 1:55 pm #

    weasel said,

    Woah.. imagine if someone invented an undigestable stem cell pill that sat in your stomach and just generated steaks all day?

    I HAVE SEEN THE FUTURE

    IT HAS NO FLAVOUR BUT IS FILLING

  5. on January 24th, 2007 at 9:37 am #

    Ashblaster said,

    I’d say a few thousand years of forced breeding and grafting are more than an “influence”.It’s easy to be a neo-luddite in North America with our technology based social support system, but try and tell those starvin marvin’s in Africa to go hungry because you don’t like that we’ve refined agricultural techniques to a minute level.

  6. on January 24th, 2007 at 11:54 am #

    Maristar said,

    I’m a little put off by this one sentence:

    “I’m a smart guy and I’m sure the multi-billion dollar industries and investors out there have thought of that problem.”

    Yes, because companies are really known for covering all their bases. That’s why there’s no lawsuits in the world.

    It was just about 8 years ago (I was going to say a couple, but I guess it’s been longer. YIKES!) that everyone thought the universe was going to implode because idiots were putting in 99 instead of 1999. THEY DIDN’T THINK OF THAT DID THEY?

    I don’t disagree with feeding the world, but I do disagree with putting too much faith in those in control.

  7. on January 24th, 2007 at 2:21 pm #

    weasel said,

    Pshaw Y2K was all media hype. I had a neighbor who thought that because car braking systems were computerized these days, they would automatically fail as soon as the date rolled over.

    You know, because car brakes are designed to work differently in 2000 than they do in 1900.

    As far as I know, the worst Y2K problem that cropped up, was some guy mail-ordered car insurance for his 2000 model car, and his confirmation letter in the mail said “Thanks for ordering your 1900 horse and buggy insurance.”

    In this day and age, viruses and infections are a huge unknown factor in the world. We don’t know when they’ll strike, they’re difficult to control, and nearly impossible to constrain. This is a HUGE investment risk; it’s a HUGE global health risk. The task of ensuring we don’t fall into that pothole isn’t that difficult. (All you have to do is keep, on file, the DNA profiles of a few hundred thousand different cows. I think we’ve already done it, in fact).

  8. on January 25th, 2007 at 12:16 am #

    Maristar said,

    Y2K was just the best example I could come up with in a pinch. It’s hardly the only example EVER.

    Your last paragraph read like: “BLABBITY BLAH BLAH BLAH” btw.

    My point: TRUSTING IS STUPID!

Put those fingers to the keys!