This week, The Fifth Estate, CBC’s documentary program, showed a doc called Fight to the Death, dealing with Chris Benoit and death in the wrestling industry. The documentary was well made, dealt with difficult subject matter in a classy way, and delivered a severe kick straight into the sweaty gonads of Nancy Grace, Geraldo Rivera, Bill O’Reilly, and all the other hype-news, fact-less blowhards that seem so common on American television.
You can watch the doc when it re-airs tomorrow night, or just watch it online here if you want to watch it before reading this.
The documentary covers Benoit’s life, the changing landscape of the wrestling industry and the long-term effects life on the road has had on a number of wrestlers. It delivered a clear, sensible conclusion after careful consideration. The same could not be said about all news outlets.
When the story first broke last year, steroids were the easiest and, as my old journalism prof would have described it, the sexiest explanation. Blaming something like this on ‘roid rage is a really easy out, it requires no research, but sounds so good. “ROID RAGE. Goddamn that’s catchy!” And it was clear that the tabloid news shows did very little research.

Between angrily yelling speculation in a shrill, authoritative tone and assuming the guilt of accused rapists long before facts are clear, Nancy Grace enjoys gardening, macrame and witchcraft.
Nancy Grace speculated that Benoit might have been upset that he had gone from the prestigious Four Horsemen (a group of wrestlers in WCW, which hadn’t existed since 1999) all the way down to Monday Night Raw (the highest rated wrestling program ever on television, which Benoit hadn’t appeared on since 2005). The blank stare on Bret Hart’s face in response to this was the lone highlight of the show.

Geraldo Rivera is a spectacular douchebag by all standards of journalistic integrity. Within the mustache growing community, however, he has risen to the rank of “Grand Wizard, Level 12.”
Geraldo went one better and even talked about how the Atlanta police may have been looking at it as a triple or quadruple murder-suicide (a truly ridiculous statement unless Rivera himself discovered two bodies he hasn’t told anyone about, or that he considered Benoit to have murdered his wife and son twice). He also showed no knowledge whatsoever about steroids, describing them as a substitute to working out, as if using steroids and sitting around eating Cheetos for the next month would result in a Herculean physique.
Anyway, Fighting to the Death is a very effective sober second thought to the Benoit issue. With ‘roid rage having been dismissed, they dive into the Sport’s Legacy Institute’s investigation into Benoit and their investigation into concussions in sports. It’s fascinating reading that makes me fear for the family of Mick Foley.
It’s clear based on what the wrestlers who knew Benoit are saying in their interviews, they don’t believe the man they knew was capable of it. Jake Roberts sums his feelings up quite clearly, saying that when he dies, if God or the Devil tell him that Chris Benoit (the man he knew, before brain damage and dementia) did those horrible things, “I’ll call them a damn liar.”
Here are my minor factual nitpicks with the documentary-
-Chris Nowinski, a former wrestler who now works with the Sports Legacy Institute, did not wrestle under the name Chris Harvard in the WWE.
-The Junkyard Dog’s death was not believed to be a result of drug problems. JYD (real name Sylvester Ritter) fell asleep at the wheel on his way back from his daughter’s highschool graduation.
-The WWE has not outlawed chair shots to the head since Benoit’s death. For example, Chris Jericho drilled JBL with a chair at the Royal Rumble.
These are minor factual inconsistencies. If you compare that to the gross distortions of fact and outright ignorance shown by tabloid journalism programs in the aftermath of Benoit’s death, it’s ridiculous. It would be funny if it didn’t make me so sick.
These shows simply skimmed over the facts at the time and ran forwards with the easiest and most sensationalized version of the story they could concoct.
As a wrestling fan, this pisses me off. As a journalist, however, it turns my fucking stomach. Every story I write, I research as much as I can. My livelihood depends on presenting facts. Repeat, FACTS. To hell with my livelihood, my ability to look at myself in the mirror and not be disgusted at what I see depends on it. I wonder how long it’s been since Grace, Rivera, Hannity, Colmes or any of these jackals looked in a mirror.
Thanks, The Fifth Estate for providing responsible content. Thank you for broadcasting content I can be proud of. Thank you for making the decision of what channel I watch, and which one I disregard, a no-brainer.

on February 10th, 2008 at 5:57 pm #
Well done in terms of the Nancy Grace and Geraldo commentary, my one beef is with the Duke rape case. In the end, the prosecutors obviously were unable to prove that any one of the accused had actually raped the woman, so yes, Nancy was not justified in assuming their guilt in that situation (Although their being acquitted still does not convince me of their objective innocence, like O.J.).
The thing that bothers me about the situation is the amount of sympathy that these assholes got in the media afterwards (especially when they made it to the NCAA lacrosse finals last year). Regardless of whether or not they actually raped the woman, the prosecutors WERE successful in revealing emails and other evidence that proved that the guys involved were fucking assholes and/or racist pricks. Regardless of whether or not they were actually rapists, people like that deserve to be slandered in public and treated like criminals.
on February 10th, 2008 at 11:23 pm #
Fair enough, but being a fucking asshole isn’t against the law (unless Proposition 402 passes, and we all pray it does).
I don’t think it’s like O.J. at all, cause there it was pretty open and shut, but was saved by legal trickery. This one didn’t really have any solid evidence that they did it. Rape is a far different case legally than murder, because before you can charge someone for doing something, you have to prove it happened. With murder, you’ve usually got a body for that. With rape, you have to be able to prove it happened, and there wasn’t enough evidence. No DNA, no real signs of rape, the “victim” had motive to frame them (they got in a fight with them because they wanted white strippers but got black and half-Asian instead).
Aside from all that though, it’s just not their place to judge the case. They don’t have to talk about them like their angels and pull punches when discussing facts, but they can’t just verbally convict them on air. These kind of shows didn’t do that with O.J., or at least not that I remember. They left that to people who are in a position to; the Lettermans, O’Briens and Norm MacDonalds of the world. I loved Norm MacDonald on Weekend Update after the O.J. trial. “Well, it’s official. Murder is legal in the state of California.”
The difference is a journalistic responsibility Nancy et al should hold themselves to. Racist dipshits get framed sometimes too.
on February 12th, 2008 at 11:03 am #
Not to derail or anything, but what WAS the “legal trickery” on the OJ trial? Sure I think he’s batshit insane but I haven’t heard any compelling reason why I shouldn’t trust the jury on that one.
Speaking of Journalistic Responsibility, I think the way people on the air say, with a blood curdling chill, “Charged… WITH MURDER.” I’ll bet if grabbed 20 people off the street and said “OH MY GOD THAT GUY’S CHARGED WITH MURDER” they would all think he actually did it.
We shouldn’t allow any discussion of ongoing trials until a verdict has been issued… because there’s always a way to sway public opinion no matter how you tone down the language.
on February 12th, 2008 at 7:12 pm #
I can’t believe that you haven’t heard of Johnnie Cochran’s (sp?) most famous defense:
“Ladies and gentleman of the jury, this is Chewbacca…”
O.J. was acquitted because Chewbacca is an 8 foot tall Wookie that hangs out with a bunch of 3 foot tall Ewoks and therefore does not make sense.
on February 12th, 2008 at 11:04 pm #
I always felt that the physical evidence pointed pretty clearly to him having done it. The legal trickery was the racist cop angle. While I’m sure Fuhrman is a complete douchebag, there’s no reasonable proof he did anything to the crime scene. There’s plenty of proof he’s an asshole, but nothing about crime scene tampering.
And besides all that, “If I Did It.” Nuff said.